Britton Law, P.A.
Free Consultation For Injury Cases
Due to precautions related to COVID-19, remote consultations via teleconferencing, Facetime or Skype are available. Please contact our office to discuss if this option is appropriate for your situation. Let’s all stay healthy and safe.

What's in a name? A lot if it triggers a contract dispute

Most everyone has probably heard of employment agreements that include a noncompete clause. They are intended to serve the legitimate purpose of protecting a company's proprietary information; its trade secrets if you will.

But like all contracts, they are only as strong as the language used to construct them. If it turns out that there is a dichotomy of opinion on the words or something else, it can lead to some serious disputes and put all sides of the issue on a track toward costly litigation.

Such fights typically involve a lot of money already, so for the sake of protecting assets, you want enforceable noncompete agreements. That usually hinges on the contracts being reasonable.

Apparently that was not found to be the situation in the dispute between Matt McCall and Richard Childress Racing. They were due to go face off in North Carolina Superior Court this week over RCR's claims that McCall had violated his noncompete agreement by taking a post with Chip Ganassi Racing after the end of last season. Instead, reports late last month noted that the two sides settled their differences. And while no one is doing any chest thumping, it seems McCall got the checkered flag.

According to NBC Sports, McCall had been working as an engineer for RCR but doing a lot of crew chief tasks. He resigned and was quickly hired as a crew chief for Ganassi. RCR claimed McCall's move violated his noncompete agreement. It said that even though McCall didn't bear the title of crew chief, his duties were identical or similar to those that he would be doing at Ganassi.

McCall observed in his court papers that not only did he not have the chief title at RCR, but also his pay with Ganassi would be three times higher than it had been at RCR.

North Carolina's Business Court ruled against RCR in a decision in December and that seems to have spurred the sides to settle. Under the terms, McCall goes to Ganassi, but other details are confidential.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Send Us An Email. We’ll Listen.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Britton Law, P.A.
2850 Village Drive, Suite 206
Fayetteville, NC 28304

Toll Free: 888-811-9738
Phone: 910-401-3356
Fayetteville Law Office Map

Britton Law, P.A. Office

Call Our Law Firm:

910-401-3356 ~or~ 888-811-9738
What's in a name? A lot if it triggers a contract dispute | Britton Law, P.A.